Uploads by SHIROKIYD

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size Description Versions
10:14, 14 July 2020 INPRO hierarchy of demands.png (file) 519 KB   1
13:17, 14 July 2020 IAEA Logo.png (file) 3 KB   2
13:58, 20 July 2020 FIG.1. Conceptual comparison of safety characteristics between an NPP and a reprocessing facility..jpg (file) 39 KB   1
09:13, 21 July 2020 FIG. 2. Components of safety management..png (file) 21 KB   1
09:18, 21 July 2020 FIG. 3. Overview of the different tasks for definition of RD&D.png (file) 14 KB   1
09:44, 21 July 2020 FIG. 4. Uranium milling process (example of acid leaching).png (file) 12 KB   1
09:50, 21 July 2020 FIG. 5. In-situ leaching process..png (file) 108 KB   1
14:28, 21 July 2020 FIG. 1. Accumulated yearly occupational dose (modified from Ref (49))..png (file) 227 KB   1
09:47, 22 July 2020 FIG 2. Overview of the different tasks for definition of RD&D..png (file) 14 KB   1
09:48, 22 July 2020 FIG 3. Objectives Provisions Tree approach (modified from Ref (71))..png (file) 15 KB   1
13:04, 22 July 2020 FIG. 4. Correlation between the frequency of accidents and dose or damage in reference NPPs and in new NESs, respectively..png (file) 10 KB   1
13:27, 22 July 2020 FIG. 5. Components of safety management (35)..png (file) 21 KB   1
10:28, 23 July 2020 FIG. 1. Public participation ladder..png (file) 15 KB   1
09:02, 27 July 2020 FIG.1. Steps in radioactive waste management (adapted from Ref (10)).png (file) 12 KB   1
09:06, 27 July 2020 FIG. 2. Conceptual illustration of a waste classification scheme (11)..png (file) 13 KB   1
09:11, 27 July 2020 FIG.3. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited waste management policy for the Chalk River and Whiteshell laboratories (adapted from Ref (1))..png (file) 31 KB   1
09:15, 27 July 2020 FIG.4. Timeline for the development of a geological disposal facility (32)..png (file) 14 KB   1
09:34, 27 July 2020 FIG. 5. Elements of a waste minimization strategy (55).png (file) 20 KB   1
12:03, 27 July 2020 FIG. 6. The concept of ALARP (71).png (file) 15 KB   1
12:12, 27 July 2020 FIG. 7. Fuel production chain including waste generation for a LWR using U fuel in an open fuel cycle.png (file) 12 KB   1
12:45, 27 July 2020 FIG. 8 A NES with an open fuel cycle.png (file) 7 KB   1
12:46, 27 July 2020 FIG. 9. A NES with thermal reactors and mono recycling of plutonium.png (file) 15 KB   1
12:47, 27 July 2020 FIG. 10. A NES with thermal and fast reactors and multi recycling of spent fuel.png (file) 12 KB   1
09:14, 28 July 2020 FIG. 1. Interfaces of a nuclear energy system with the environment (21)..png (file) 35 KB   1
09:17, 28 July 2020 FIG. 2. Flow chart of an environmental stressor analysis (adapted from Ref. (21))..png (file) 28 KB   1
09:40, 28 July 2020 FIG. 3. Environmental performance envelopes of a current nuclear energy system (blue) and an innovative nuclear energy system.png (file) 26 KB   1
13:25, 28 July 2020 FIG. 4. Chain of decay of 238U (g amma emitters not marked) (1)..png (file) 29 KB   1
09:00, 30 July 2020 FIG. 5. The ALARP concept (21)..png (file) 18 KB   1
09:03, 30 July 2020 FIG. 6. Proposed method for ALARP applied in sequence to all facilities (components) of a nuclear energy system (NES) or,.png (file) 50 KB   1
14:49, 30 July 2020 INPRO Sustainability Assessment Menu.png (file) 148 KB Color change 2
09:01, 4 August 2020 FIG. 1. Interfaces of a nuclear energy system with the environment (1)..png (file) 114 KB   1
12:23, 4 August 2020 FIG. 2. Uranium prices in the time period 1980–2010 (13)..png (file) 64 KB   1
12:24, 4 August 2020 FIG. 3. Trends in uranium exploration and development expenditures 1998–2011 (13)..png (file) 34 KB   1
12:29, 4 August 2020 FIG. 4. Historic demand and supply of uranium (13)..png (file) 73 KB   1
12:30, 4 August 2020 FIG. 5. Projected annual world uranium production capability to 2035 compared with projected world uranium demand (13)..png (file) 84 KB   1
12:36, 4 August 2020 FIG. 6. Resource contribution by confidence level (11). EAR — estimated additional resources; RAR — reasonable assured resource;.png (file) 120 KB   1
12:39, 4 August 2020 FIG. 7. Nuclear fuel cycle of a thermal reactor with recycling of uranium and plutonium (27)..png (file) 117 KB   1
12:40, 4 August 2020 FIG. 8. Scenarios for global nuclear power (27)..png (file) 57 KB   1
12:44, 4 August 2020 FIG. 9. Expected annual uranium requirements for the three selected scenarios with different growth rates of nuclear power (27)..png (file) 69 KB   1
12:44, 4 August 2020 FIG. 10. Expected annual production of uranium from primary resources (27)..png (file) 75 KB   1
12:45, 4 August 2020 FIG. 11. Expected global supply from secondary uranium sources based on different assumptions (27)..png (file) 65 KB   1
12:46, 4 August 2020 FIG. 12. Comparison of predicted supply by primary resources and secondary sources with demand for the reference scenario (27)..png (file) 68 KB   1
13:10, 4 August 2020 FIG. 13. Selected world models for fuel cycle analysis in GAINS (3)..jpg (file) 45 KB   1
13:10, 4 August 2020 FIG. 14. Heterogeneous model with non-synergistic groups NG1–NG3 (3)..jpg (file) 78 KB   1
13:11, 4 August 2020 FIG. 15. Heterogeneous model with synergistic groups and specific reactor types and fuel services identified.jpg (file) 79 KB   1
13:13, 4 August 2020 FIG. 16. GAINS scenarios for modelling nuclear power generation in the twenty-first century. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change..png (file) 26 KB   1
13:22, 4 August 2020 FIG. 17a. Power generation in the BAU+ scenario in a homogeneous world (high case on the left, moderate case on the right). ALWR — advanced light water reactor; HWR — heavy water reactor; LWR — light water reactor..png (file) 34 KB   1
13:23, 4 August 2020 FIG. 17b. Power generation in the BAU+ scenario in a homogeneous world (high case on the left, moderate case on the right). ALWR — advanced light water reactor; HWR — heavy water reactor; LWR — light water reactor..png (file) 35 KB   1
13:25, 4 August 2020 FIG. 18. Total global uranium usage for the BAU+ scenario in a homogeneous world (high case on the left, moderate case on the right). ktHM — kilotonnes of heavy metal..png (file) 32 KB   1
13:26, 4 August 2020 FIG. 18b. Total global uranium usage for the BAU+ scenario in a homogeneous world (high case on the left, moderate case on the right). ktHM — kilotonnes of heavy metal..png (file) 30 KB   1
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page