Uncategorized files

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Showing below up to 50 results in range #101 to #150.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Fig. 11. Russian scenario- (a) First step, (b) Second step (in the case of a high energy demand), (c) Second step (in the case of energy demand stabilization)..png 968 × 234; 12 KB
Fig. 12. Back end synergistic case in the global scenario..png 921 × 704; 154 KB
Fig. 12. Performance and ranking results for advanced NFC options..png 3,754 × 1,173; 713 KB
Fig. 13. Long term storages of LWR SNF in NG1 (synergistic case).png 675 × 441; 66 KB
Fig. 14. Levelized fuel cycle unit costs..png 1,333 × 675; 63 KB
Fig. 15. The value of reprocessed uranium as a function of the cost of natural uranium, with fabrication costs held fixed.png 769 × 395; 75 KB
Fig. 16. The minimum required averted disposal costs of HLW for each storage duration and REPU enrichment..png 812 × 342; 16 KB
Fig. 17. Reduction of minor actinides (MA) in the waste and increase of the inventory of minor actinides in the fuel cycle in scenarios with transmutation of minor actinides..png 577 × 197; 17 KB
Fig. 18. Pu and MA inventories in disposal facilities at the end of scenario cycle..png 1,368 × 682; 38 KB
Fig. 2. Overall view of the considered synergies among the technologies..png 1,386 × 922; 180 KB
Fig. 2. Schematics of MAVT..png 852 × 342; 55 KB
Fig. 3. Flowchart of MCDA application..png 509 × 607; 115 KB
Fig. 3. Nature of synergies within the SYNERGIES storyline (the lower bar shows the degree of technological readiness in conventional units (18))..png 945 × 445; 90 KB
Fig. 4. CAREM - small PWR reactor of Argentinian design of 25 MWe capacity..jpg 800 × 376; 145 KB
Fig. 4. Schematics of the objectives tree..png 863 × 797; 133 KB
Fig. 5. Fresh fuel annual requirements (left) and cumulative spent fuel in storages (right)..png 848 × 332; 74 KB
Fig. 5. Inputs of KIND-ET (example)..png 868 × 322; 106 KB
Fig. 6. Outputs of KIND-ET (example)..png 906 × 465; 215 KB
Fig. 6 Cumulative spent fuel accumulation in two scenarios..png 1,019 × 332; 82 KB
Fig. 7. Structure of the objectives tree in the case study from Romania..png 868 × 291; 52 KB
Fig. 7b SYNEGRIES.png 478 × 427; 172 KB
Fig. 7c SYNERGIES.png 478 × 427; 131 KB
Fig. 7d SYNERGIES.png 478 × 427; 167 KB
Fig. 7e SYNERGIES.png 488 × 427; 188 KB
Fig. 8. High level objectives (HLO) scores for- (a) case 1; (b) case 2; (c) case 3..png 1,809 × 1,063; 83 KB
Fig. 8 Comparison of the amounts of spent nuclear fuel in interim storage in the two EU27 scenarios..png 727 × 298; 65 KB
Fig. 9. Ranking results for comparative evaluation of an NES and a CPP (base case)..png 587 × 374; 16 KB
Fig. 9. Scheme of regional collaboration on spent nuclear fuel utilization..png 1,920 × 1,080; 101 KB
Gongshi1.png 606 × 47; 2 KB
Gongshi2and3.png 607 × 84; 3 KB
Gongshi4.png 606 × 33; 2 KB
Gongshi5.png 82 × 56; 1 KB
Gongshi6.png 185 × 43; 2 KB
IAEA Logo.png 80 × 100; 3 KB
INPRO Sub-Logo blue.png 150 × 66; 10 KB
INPRO Sustainability Assessment Menu.png 1,227 × 742; 148 KB
INPRO hierarchy of demands.png 2,062 × 1,157; 519 KB
Image00003.png 869 × 867; 130 KB
Image001.png 894 × 731; 144 KB
Image003.png 540 × 547; 154 KB
Image005.png 2,014 × 1,544; 1.6 MB
Image007.png 1,710 × 731; 96 KB
Image009.png 1,291 × 586; 69 KB
Image011.png 1,065 × 725; 55 KB
Image013.png 902 × 290; 24 KB
Image015.png 647 × 361; 32 KB
Image017.png 912 × 286; 21 KB
Image019.png 568 × 326; 26 KB
Image021.png 945 × 373; 59 KB
Image023.png 946 × 351; 39 KB

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "http://inpro-dev.westeurope.cloudapp.azure.com/wiki/index.php/Special:UncategorizedFiles"

Navigation menu