Gallery of new files
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This special page shows the last uploaded files.
Fig. 7. Structure of the objectives tree in the case study from Romania..png SHIROKIYD
10:12, 24 August 2020
868 × 291; 52 KB
Fig. 1. Scope (a) and schematics (b) of multi-criteria decision analysis..png SHIROKIYD
09:58, 24 August 2020
852 × 529; 145 KB
FIG. 13. Pay-back period for R&D cost for the innovative nuclear energy system for different installed capacities..png SHIROKIYD
09:34, 24 August 2020
697 × 462; 30 KB
FIG. 12. Plutonium in short-term cooled SNF for the moderate GAINS scenario..png SHIROKIYD
09:25, 24 August 2020
443 × 341; 44 KB
FIG. 11. Potential for fast reactor deployment..png SHIROKIYD
09:23, 24 August 2020
622 × 470; 55 KB
FIG. 10. Cumulative amounts of spent fuel in BAU(a) and BAU&FR (b) systems for the high GAINS scenario..png SHIROKIYD
09:21, 24 August 2020
984 × 406; 43 KB
FIG. 9. Cumulative natural uranium demand in BAU (a) and BAU&FR (b) systems for the high GAINS scenario..png SHIROKIYD
09:18, 24 August 2020
1,045 × 429; 72 KB
FIG. 8. Power production growth for BAU (a) and BAU&FR systems (b)..png SHIROKIYD
09:15, 24 August 2020
1,212 × 446; 34 KB
FIG. 7. Flow chart for a combined once-through cycle and fast reactor closed fuel cycle system.png SHIROKIYD
14:13, 21 August 2020
948 × 574; 66 KB
FIG. 6. Variation in technical maturity for reactor designs in the GAINS database.png SHIROKIYD
14:00, 21 August 2020
928 × 920; 988 KB
FIG. 4. Heterogeneous models for future global nuclear fuel cycles..png SHIROKIYD
13:50, 21 August 2020
554 × 192; 16 KB
FIG. 3. GAINS scenarios for modelling nuclear power generation (GWa values show actual electric power produced annually, not installed capacity)..png SHIROKIYD
13:48, 21 August 2020
1,044 × 891; 51 KB
FIG. 2. Set of reactor and fuel types with deployment time frames..jpg SHIROKIYD
13:44, 21 August 2020
1,162 × 818; 141 KB
FIG.1. 5th Meeting of the INPRO Collaborative Project GAINS, 27 May 2010..jpg SHIROKIYD
13:41, 21 August 2020
1,258 × 829; 242 KB
Fig. 18. Pu and MA inventories in disposal facilities at the end of scenario cycle..png SHIROKIYD
12:41, 21 August 2020
1,368 × 682; 38 KB
Fig. 16. The minimum required averted disposal costs of HLW for each storage duration and REPU enrichment..png SHIROKIYD
12:38, 21 August 2020
812 × 342; 16 KB
Fig. 15. The value of reprocessed uranium as a function of the cost of natural uranium, with fabrication costs held fixed.png SHIROKIYD
12:37, 21 August 2020
769 × 395; 75 KB
Fig. 13. Long term storages of LWR SNF in NG1 (synergistic case).png SHIROKIYD
12:35, 21 August 2020
675 × 441; 66 KB
Fig. 12. Back end synergistic case in the global scenario..png SHIROKIYD
12:34, 21 August 2020
921 × 704; 154 KB
Fig. 10. French scenario- (a) First step, (b) Second step of transition to the NES based on closed nuclear fuel cycle..png SHIROKIYD
12:33, 21 August 2020
811 × 155; 8 KB
Fig. 9. Scheme of regional collaboration on spent nuclear fuel utilization..png SHIROKIYD
12:30, 21 August 2020
1,920 × 1,080; 101 KB
Fig. 8 Comparison of the amounts of spent nuclear fuel in interim storage in the two EU27 scenarios..png SHIROKIYD
12:29, 21 August 2020
727 × 298; 65 KB
Fig. 6 Cumulative spent fuel accumulation in two scenarios..png SHIROKIYD
10:08, 21 August 2020
1,019 × 332; 82 KB
Fig. 5. Fresh fuel annual requirements (left) and cumulative spent fuel in storages (right)..png SHIROKIYD
10:07, 21 August 2020
848 × 332; 74 KB
Fig. 4. CAREM - small PWR reactor of Argentinian design of 25 MWe capacity..jpg SHIROKIYD
10:02, 21 August 2020
800 × 376; 145 KB
Fig. 3. Nature of synergies within the SYNERGIES storyline (the lower bar shows the degree of technological readiness in conventional units (18))..png SHIROKIYD
09:59, 21 August 2020
945 × 445; 90 KB
Fig. 2. Overall view of the considered synergies among the technologies..png SHIROKIYD
09:53, 21 August 2020
1,386 × 922; 180 KB
FIG. 6. Flowchart of uranium refining and conversion..png SHIROKIYD
07:26, 6 August 2020
613 × 225; 14 KB
FIG. 25. Fuel production chain for a light water reactor using uranium fuel in an open fuel cycle..jpg SHIROKIYD
08:18, 5 August 2020
1,110 × 253; 72 KB
..png)
..png){kind=small}
_and_schematics_(b)_of_multi-criteria_decision_analysis..png)
_and_BAU%26FR_(b)_systems_for_the_high_GAINS_scenario..png)
_and_BAU%26FR_(b)_systems_for_the_high_GAINS_scenario..png){kind=small}
_and_BAU%26FR_systems_(b)..png){kind=small}
..png){kind=spacer}
_in_the_waste_and_increase_of_the_inventory_of_minor_actinides_in_the_fuel_cycle_in_scenarios_with_transmutation_of_minor_actinides..png){kind=spacer}
.png)
_First_step,_(b)_Second_step_(in_the_case_of_a_high_energy_demand),_(c)_Second_step_(in_the_case_of_energy_demand_stabilization)..png){kind=small}
_First_step,_(b)_Second_step_of_transition_to_the_NES_based_on_closed_nuclear_fuel_cycle..png){kind=spacer}
_and_cumulative_spent_fuel_in_storages_(right)..png){kind=small}
)..png)
