Uncategorized files

Showing below up to 50 results in range #51 to #100.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

• 

  FIG. 3. GAINS scenarios for modelling nuclear power generation (GWa values show actual electric power produced annually, not installed capacity)..png 1,044 × 891; 51 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 3. Overview of the different tasks for definition of RD&D.png 614 × 343; 14 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 3. Trends in uranium exploration and development expenditures 1998–2011 (13)..png 452 × 307; 34 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 4. Chain of decay of 238U (g amma emitters not marked) (1)..png 544 × 278; 29 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 4. Correlation between the frequency of accidents and dose or damage in reference NPPs and in new NESs, respectively..png 469 × 254; 10 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 4. Heterogeneous models for future global nuclear fuel cycles..png 554 × 192; 16 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 4. Historic demand and supply of uranium (13)..png 514 × 334; 73 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 4. Uranium milling process (example of acid leaching).png 616 × 200; 12 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 5..png 999 × 465; 50 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 5. Components of safety management (35)..png 482 × 445; 21 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 5. Elements of a waste minimization strategy (55).png 592 × 406; 20 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 5. In-situ leaching process..png 572 × 366; 108 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 5. Projected annual world uranium production capability to 2035 compared with projected world uranium demand (13)..png 514 × 359; 84 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 5. The ALARP concept (21)..png 432 × 274; 18 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 6. Flowchart of uranium refining and conversion..png 613 × 225; 14 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 6. Proposed method for ALARP applied in sequence to all facilities (components) of a nuclear energy system (NES) or,.png 555 × 682; 50 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 6. Resource contribution by confidence level (11). EAR — estimated additional resources; RAR — reasonable assured resource;.png 591 × 341; 120 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 6. The concept of ALARP (71).png 472 × 301; 15 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 6. Variation in technical maturity for reactor designs in the GAINS database.png 928 × 920; 988 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 7. Flow chart for a combined once-through cycle and fast reactor closed fuel cycle system.png 948 × 574; 66 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 7. Fuel production chain including waste generation for a LWR using U fuel in an open fuel cycle.png 603 × 145; 12 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 7. Gas centrifuge process..png 590 × 450; 198 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 7. Nuclear fuel cycle of a thermal reactor with recycling of uranium and plutonium (27)..png 400 × 274; 117 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 8. Conventional PUREX process..png 589 × 189; 14 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 8. Power production growth for BAU (a) and BAU&FR systems (b)..png 1,212 × 446; 34 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 8. Scenarios for global nuclear power (27)..png 474 × 259; 57 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 8 A NES with an open fuel cycle.png 477 × 131; 7 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 9. A NES with thermal reactors and mono recycling of plutonium.png 577 × 227; 15 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 9. Cumulative natural uranium demand in BAU (a) and BAU&FR (b) systems for the high GAINS scenario..png 1,045 × 429; 72 KB
  
• 

  FIG. 9. Expected annual uranium requirements for the three selected scenarios with different growth rates of nuclear power (27)..png 473 × 258; 69 KB
  
• 

  FIG 2. Overview of the different tasks for definition of RD&D..png 590 × 327; 14 KB
  
• 

  FIG 3. Objectives Provisions Tree approach (modified from Ref (71))..png 603 × 271; 15 KB
  
• 

  Fig.1.png 548 × 346; 324 KB
  
• 

  Fig.10.png 771 × 525; 539 KB
  
• 

  Fig.11.png 771 × 495; 471 KB
  
• 

  Fig.12.png 771 × 508; 66 KB
  
• 

  Fig.13.png 771 × 508; 116 KB
  
• 

  Fig.2.png 771 × 422; 553 KB
  
• 

  Fig.3.png 771 × 210; 166 KB
  
• 

  Fig.4.png 771 × 384; 522 KB
  
• 

  Fig.5.png 771 × 508; 94 KB
  
• 

  Fig.6.png 771 × 508; 75 KB
  
• 

  Fig.7.png 771 × 508; 100 KB
  
• 

  Fig.8.png 771 × 508; 88 KB
  
• 

  Fig.9.png 771 × 508; 106 KB
  
• 

  Fig. 1. SYNERGIES storyline.png 1,380 × 784; 178 KB
  
• 

  Fig. 1. Scope (a) and schematics (b) of multi-criteria decision analysis..png 852 × 529; 145 KB
  
• 

  Fig. 10. French scenario- (a) First step, (b) Second step of transition to the NES based on closed nuclear fuel cycle..png 811 × 155; 8 KB
  
• 

  Fig. 10. Sensitivity analysis for NES and CPP performed by varying the acceptability weighting factor..png 1,046 × 571; 36 KB
  
• 

  Fig. 11. Ranking of the NES deployment scenarios..png 891 × 357; 37 KB
  

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)