Uploads by SHIROKIYD

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size Description Versions
12:13, 24 August 2020 KIND. Unnamed 2.png (file) 126 KB   1
12:03, 24 August 2020 Fig. 12. Performance and ranking results for advanced NFC options..png (file) 713 KB   1
12:01, 24 August 2020 Fig. 11. Ranking of the NES deployment scenarios..png (file) 37 KB new 1
10:15, 24 August 2020 Fig. 10. Sensitivity analysis for NES and CPP performed by varying the acceptability weighting factor..png (file) 36 KB   1
10:15, 24 August 2020 Fig. 9. Ranking results for comparative evaluation of an NES and a CPP (base case)..png (file) 16 KB   1
10:13, 24 August 2020 Fig. 8. High level objectives (HLO) scores for- (a) case 1; (b) case 2; (c) case 3..png (file) 83 KB   1
10:12, 24 August 2020 Fig. 7. Structure of the objectives tree in the case study from Romania..png (file) 52 KB   1
10:09, 24 August 2020 Fig. 6. Outputs of KIND-ET (example)..png (file) 215 KB   1
10:08, 24 August 2020 Fig. 5. Inputs of KIND-ET (example)..png (file) 106 KB   1
10:06, 24 August 2020 Fig. 4. Schematics of the objectives tree..png (file) 133 KB   1
10:03, 24 August 2020 Fig. 3. Flowchart of MCDA application..png (file) 115 KB   1
09:59, 24 August 2020 Fig. 2. Schematics of MAVT..png (file) 55 KB   1
09:58, 24 August 2020 Fig. 1. Scope (a) and schematics (b) of multi-criteria decision analysis..png (file) 145 KB   1
09:56, 24 August 2020 KIND.Unnamed.png (file) 119 KB   1
09:34, 24 August 2020 FIG. 13. Pay-back period for R&D cost for the innovative nuclear energy system for different installed capacities..png (file) 30 KB   1
09:25, 24 August 2020 FIG. 12. Plutonium in short-term cooled SNF for the moderate GAINS scenario..png (file) 44 KB   1
09:23, 24 August 2020 FIG. 11. Potential for fast reactor deployment..png (file) 55 KB   1
09:21, 24 August 2020 FIG. 10. Cumulative amounts of spent fuel in BAU(a) and BAU&FR (b) systems for the high GAINS scenario..png (file) 43 KB   1
09:18, 24 August 2020 FIG. 9. Cumulative natural uranium demand in BAU (a) and BAU&FR (b) systems for the high GAINS scenario..png (file) 72 KB   1
09:15, 24 August 2020 FIG. 8. Power production growth for BAU (a) and BAU&FR systems (b)..png (file) 34 KB   1
14:13, 21 August 2020 FIG. 7. Flow chart for a combined once-through cycle and fast reactor closed fuel cycle system.png (file) 66 KB   1
14:00, 21 August 2020 FIG. 6. Variation in technical maturity for reactor designs in the GAINS database.png (file) 988 KB   1
13:52, 21 August 2020 FIG. 5..png (file) 50 KB   1
13:50, 21 August 2020 FIG. 4. Heterogeneous models for future global nuclear fuel cycles..png (file) 16 KB   1
13:48, 21 August 2020 FIG. 3. GAINS scenarios for modelling nuclear power generation (GWa values show actual electric power produced annually, not installed capacity)..png (file) 51 KB   1
13:44, 21 August 2020 FIG. 2. Set of reactor and fuel types with deployment time frames..jpg (file) 141 KB   1
13:41, 21 August 2020 FIG.1. 5th Meeting of the INPRO Collaborative Project GAINS, 27 May 2010..jpg (file) 242 KB   1
13:17, 21 August 2020 ASENES Menu.png (file) 183 KB 3rd block changed 2
12:41, 21 August 2020 Fig. 18. Pu and MA inventories in disposal facilities at the end of scenario cycle..png (file) 38 KB   1
12:39, 21 August 2020 Fig. 17. Reduction of minor actinides (MA) in the waste and increase of the inventory of minor actinides in the fuel cycle in scenarios with transmutation of minor actinides..png (file) 17 KB   1
12:38, 21 August 2020 Fig. 16. The minimum required averted disposal costs of HLW for each storage duration and REPU enrichment..png (file) 16 KB   1
12:37, 21 August 2020 Fig. 15. The value of reprocessed uranium as a function of the cost of natural uranium, with fabrication costs held fixed.png (file) 75 KB   1
12:36, 21 August 2020 Fig. 14. Levelized fuel cycle unit costs..png (file) 63 KB   1
12:35, 21 August 2020 Fig. 13. Long term storages of LWR SNF in NG1 (synergistic case).png (file) 66 KB   1
12:34, 21 August 2020 Fig. 12. Back end synergistic case in the global scenario..png (file) 154 KB   1
12:33, 21 August 2020 Fig. 11. Russian scenario- (a) First step, (b) Second step (in the case of a high energy demand), (c) Second step (in the case of energy demand stabilization)..png (file) 12 KB   1
12:33, 21 August 2020 Fig. 10. French scenario- (a) First step, (b) Second step of transition to the NES based on closed nuclear fuel cycle..png (file) 8 KB   1
12:30, 21 August 2020 Fig. 9. Scheme of regional collaboration on spent nuclear fuel utilization..png (file) 101 KB   1
12:29, 21 August 2020 Fig. 8 Comparison of the amounts of spent nuclear fuel in interim storage in the two EU27 scenarios..png (file) 65 KB   1
12:15, 21 August 2020 Fig. 7e SYNERGIES.png (file) 188 KB   1
12:15, 21 August 2020 Fig. 7d SYNERGIES.png (file) 167 KB   1
12:15, 21 August 2020 Fig. 7c SYNERGIES.png (file) 131 KB   1
12:14, 21 August 2020 Fig. 7b SYNEGRIES.png (file) 172 KB   1
12:10, 21 August 2020 7a.png (file) 101 KB   1
10:08, 21 August 2020 Fig. 6 Cumulative spent fuel accumulation in two scenarios..png (file) 82 KB   1
10:07, 21 August 2020 Fig. 5. Fresh fuel annual requirements (left) and cumulative spent fuel in storages (right)..png (file) 74 KB   1
10:02, 21 August 2020 Fig. 4. CAREM - small PWR reactor of Argentinian design of 25 MWe capacity..jpg (file) 145 KB   1
09:59, 21 August 2020 Fig. 3. Nature of synergies within the SYNERGIES storyline (the lower bar shows the degree of technological readiness in conventional units (18))..png (file) 90 KB   1
09:53, 21 August 2020 Fig. 2. Overall view of the considered synergies among the technologies..png (file) 180 KB   1
09:49, 21 August 2020 Fig. 1. SYNERGIES storyline.png (file) 178 KB   1
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page